[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.

From: Bozhidar Batsov
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 20:05:19 +0200

+1 from me for migration to git.

On 2 January 2014 17:41, Karl Fogel <address@hidden> wrote:
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>I don't insist that Emacs should stay with bzr.  I chose to support
>bzr because it was still a contender at the time.

Now that RMS has dropped the bzr requirement, I propose we move to git.
ESR has graciously offered to be technical lead for such a migration.

Does anyone think we should stay on bzr, or choose a VCS other than git?

If there is significant support for a different system, then I guess we
should hold a poll.  But my (tentative) expectation is that there will
be a pretty clear overall group preference for git -- I'm mainly posting
this so there's a place for people to follow up to express their
preference, so we can quickly get a sense of whether moving to git is
the obvious call for the group as a whole, not just for those of us who
have been been expressing that preference for some time.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]