[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:09:11 +0200

> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
> Cc: David Kastrup <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:57:49 -0500
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 18:09 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > E.g., try xdisp.c: it takes git more than 4 minutes to display
> > anything in response to "C-x v g" (2 minutes if done from the
> > shell). Looking into ChangeLog's is surely faster.
> As a point of comparsion, on my system
>     $ time hg blame xdisp.c > foo
>     real  0m55.426s
>     user  0m54.083s
>     sys   0m1.032s
>     $ time git blame xdisp.c > foo
>     real  3m24.979s
>     user  3m5.920s
>     sys   0m3.032s

I don't see any point in these comparisons (having been there before),
but since you started...

  D:\gnu\bzr\emacs\trunk>timep bzr annotate src/xdisp.c > foo
  real    00h00m29.265s
  user    00h00m26.578s
  sys     00h00m00.843s

  $ time git blame src/xdisp.c > foo
  real    2m5.281s
  user    0m0.015s
  sys     0m0.000s

(This is on Windows, so in the case of git, the user and system times
are bogus, because Windows provides no means of accounting for
grandchildren subprocesses.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]