[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:09:11 +0200 |
> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
> Cc: David Kastrup <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:57:49 -0500
>
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 18:09 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > E.g., try xdisp.c: it takes git more than 4 minutes to display
> > anything in response to "C-x v g" (2 minutes if done from the
> > shell). Looking into ChangeLog's is surely faster.
>
> As a point of comparsion, on my system
>
> $ time hg blame xdisp.c > foo
>
> real 0m55.426s
> user 0m54.083s
> sys 0m1.032s
>
> $ time git blame xdisp.c > foo
>
> real 3m24.979s
> user 3m5.920s
> sys 0m3.032s
I don't see any point in these comparisons (having been there before),
but since you started...
D:\gnu\bzr\emacs\trunk>timep bzr annotate src/xdisp.c > foo
real 00h00m29.265s
user 00h00m26.578s
sys 00h00m00.843s
$ time git blame src/xdisp.c > foo
real 2m5.281s
user 0m0.015s
sys 0m0.000s
(This is on Windows, so in the case of git, the user and system times
are bogus, because Windows provides no means of accounting for
grandchildren subprocesses.)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Bastien, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Florian Weimer, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Richard Stallman, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Florian Weimer, 2014/01/05
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Richard Stallman, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/06
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Kastrup, 2014/01/07
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/07
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/07
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Sam Steingold, 2014/01/02
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, David Reitter, 2014/01/03