[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jan 2014 03:48:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Eric S. Raymond) writes:
> The thread on the git move proposal is showing signs of exhaustion and
> terminal topic drift. We can ask Karl Fogel for a poll count but I
> think we all know how that would turn out; the pro-git vote has
> been overwhelming.
>
> I have asked Andreas Schwab and he reports the Savannah git mirror
> ready for production use. Having examined it, I agree. Andreas and I
> have discussed the switchover and believe it should consist of the
> following steps:
>
> 1. Andreas will turn off bzr commit mirroring.
>
> 2. Andreas will enter a small documentation commit recording the changeover.
>
> 3. Andreas will announce on the dev list that the git repo is live for
> developer pushes.
>
> 4. I will do the work required to update /etc and /admin for git use
> over the following few days.
>
What about branches? I have a long-lived branch in the bzr repo.
In my case I can just drop the branch and make a new git repo, but I
think we need a statement on branch handling nevertheless.
> I am now recommending that Andreas perform steps 1-3 at his convenience, no
> sooner than 2014-01-06T11:59:00 and no later than 2014-01-07T11:59:00 -
> that is, sometime tomorrow.
>
> Consideration of workflow changes is explicitly deferred. Developers
> should continue writing ChangeLog entries as per established custom.
>
> I want to extend a thank you to everyone who participated in the
> debate, *including* the anti-git dissenters, for generally sticking to
> real issues and maintaining civility.
>
> Stefan, please either (a) confirm that you as the official maintainer
> are authorizing this, or (b) put a hold on it and explain what
> additional steps or conditions you deem necessary before we move.
--
Joakim Verona
RE: Move to git is not imminent - esr is just tired of talking about it, Drew Adams, 2014/01/06
Re: Move to git is not imminent - esr is just tired of talking about it, David Kastrup, 2014/01/06
Re: Move to git is not imminent - esr is just tired of talking about it, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/01/06
Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval,
joakim <=
Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval, Martin Geisler, 2014/01/15
Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval, Yuri Khan, 2014/01/15
Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval, Angelo Graziosi, 2014/01/06