|Subject:||Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]|
|Date:||Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:50:28 +0100|
Joel Mccracken <address@hidden> writes:Emacs _is_ one of the old great ones. You are trying to make Gandalf
> Beyond trying to remember, using current terminology is sends the
> message that Emacs is old, stubborn, and crufty, which is a problem
> when trying to introduce new users to Emacs.
more popular by plucking his nose hairs.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|