[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2 |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:31:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> It is already that way.
Yes, thanks, I was confused by the multiple partial reverts.
>> There is zero rush to make any of these Git changes.
>
> Indeed, I suggest to do all of that on a branch.
I already suggested that too.
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, (continued)
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, David Kastrup, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, David Kastrup, 2014/01/12
- Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/12
Re: VCSWITNESS = fail ** 2, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/13