[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: clang vs free software

From: Thien-Thi Nguyen
Subject: Re: clang vs free software
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:00:26 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

() Rüdiger Sonderfeld <address@hidden>
() Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:34:10 +0100

   For gcc-etags to a file in etag format 
   and for the other experiment a sexp.

Why not write a server to which this plugin can send the hard-won
information?  The server's job is to persist all those (incoming)
goodies in a database somewhere (say, $projroot/.static-bits.db).
Other clients can request the subset that is interesting to them,
e.g., for etags (re)format(ting).

This architecture is HURD-friendly, too (IIUC the HURD mindset).
GNU Serveez + Guile-PG + SMOP ... 149 lines of Scheme, max.  :-D

Thien-Thi Nguyen
   GPG key: 4C807502
   (if you're human and you know it)
      read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
                               (not (via 'mailing-list)))
                     => nil

Attachment: pgp8SkN7XvTrV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]