[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: clang vs free software

From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: Re: clang vs free software
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:24:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 22.01.2014 17:31, Richard Stallman wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

GNU Emacs does not exist in isolation.  It is a part of the GNU
Project.  "Success" for GNU Emacs means success for GNU.

Our policy is not to install features in GNU package that would work
with Clang and not with GCC.  Emacs will not encourage people to
switch away from GCC.  Indeed, when we have the chance, we should
encourage GCC over Clang.

I see. Thank you for the clarification.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]