[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clang vs free software
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: clang vs free software |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:06:37 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
IMO, we would be better served with legal hurdles than with technical
hurdles. E.g. the license could say that using GCC as platform for
proprietary compilers (DragonEgg) are not allowed, while using GCC as
platform for free compilers (or editors like Emacs) is allowed and
welcome.
We have made an effort in this direction already. I'm in favor of
doing more. Designing such schemes is not easy, but we can try.
They need to be based on specific real scenarios, so we can find the
place to draw the line between the good scenarios and the bad ones.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: clang vs free software, (continued)
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Daniel Colascione, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Helmut Eller, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Helmut Eller, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: clang vs free software, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, David Engster, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, unic0rn, 2014/01/21
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/20
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/19
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, John Yates, 2014/01/20