[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Repo cpnversion progress report

From: Eric S. Raymond
Subject: Re: Repo cpnversion progress report
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:26:17 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
> To reduce the load, you can just skip the "conversion to action stamps".

I've already paid the time and complexity cost for that.  There's not
really a savings there.

> For fixes it's very different.  The way it works is: vc-annotate tells
> me the code was changed in commit NNNN and that commit says it's linked
> to bug#MMMM so I go check bug#MMMM to try and understand why the code is
> the way it is.  This is a fairly common occurrence, and it's common to
> use the bug#NNNN reference as an "excuse" to keep the commit log
> shorter, so it's important to preserve this info.

I agree. This goes on the list of use cases that needs to be supported
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]