[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept?

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept?
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:01:44 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

> The dead branches complicate this process a *lot*, esoecially the part
> where I back up through the history looking for a ChangeLog entry marking
> the actual deletion point.  I just figured out that the reason I've only
> found two real deletion points in sixteen tries is because the dead
> branches are getting in the way.

I don't understand why those branches make any difference, unless you're
trying to do your analysis also on those branches, which is
not worthwhile.  Just preserve their info "as-is".  The only important
part is that if someone wants to look at them he doesn't need to go back
to Bzr.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]