[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:36:53 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
The argument for the FSF assignment policy is that it makes the
license much easier to enforce.
Yes, but...
Ie, it is the position of the FSF
that failing to collect assignments creates "situations where [the
GPL] cannot be taken seriously and/or enforced."
that is putting it too strongly. This does not make it impossible, but
it makes things harder in some ways.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, (continued)
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/03/05
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/10
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/11
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/03/05
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/11
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/03
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Barry OReilly, 2014/03/11
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Michał Nazarewicz, 2014/03/26
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Michal Nazarewicz, 2014/03/27