Re: Trunk still not open

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:02:53 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:35:41 +0100
> >> 
> >> Well, one could push them to an "undocumented" branch.  That one gets
> >> rebased from time to time on the trunk, so any commit from there that
> >> has made it with documentation into the trunk will no longer be in there
> >> after rebasing.
> >
> > This could also work, but IMO this alternative is more complicated
> > than the other one, and also has the disadvantage that changes appear
> > on the trunk with delay, which some users might not like.
> 
> Well, that's the point.  A state that isn't an annoyance to anybody is
> not likely to change.

Annoyance might also lead to unwanted consequences, like rebellion.