[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Converted git repository available for review
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Converted git repository available for review |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:50:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> > The review1 repo has only had one push.
>
> If the sole difference before the next push is a git gc --aggressive, it
> still won't have a reason to fetch anything.
>
> If you did a whole history rewrite invalidating all previous references,
> things will be different. Though then there is not all that much
> incentive to using the same repository.
That's likely to be nearly the case, since I'm going to tryt a different set
of transformations for ignore files after Paul Eggert's feedback.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, (continued)
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/22
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/22
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/22
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, James Cloos, 2014/03/24
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/24
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, David Kastrup, 2014/03/25
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/25
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, David Kastrup, 2014/03/25
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/25
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, David Kastrup, 2014/03/25
- Re: Converted git repository available for review,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, Phillip Lord, 2014/03/25
- Re: Converted git repository available for review, David Kastrup, 2014/03/25