|Subject:||Re: From etags to ctags?|
|Date:||Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:44:32 -0400|
> How do you think, does it make sense to create direct support of ctags
> format, like it done for etags now?
Sure. And it wouldn't surprise me if such support already exists "out there".
Got busy today, I'll try to get to it tomorrow.
On Saturday, August 24, 2013, Edward Bishop wrote:Oops, I meant to say etags compatibility, not gtags compatibility.On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Edward Bishop <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi John,I would be delighted if someone would take ownership!I have a couple of versions. At one point I was trying to maintain compatibility with gtags but that was a nightmare. What I use now is a simpler stripped down version. I'm on the road right now, but I'll send you the latest when I get home tomorrow.-Edward
On Saturday, August 24, 2013, John Yates wrote:Do you have a version more recent than 1.6? Would you mind if someone else
took more public ownership?
Message sent via/by Savannah
Description: Binary data
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|