[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:52:06 -0400 |
> Is there some specific reason why M-. (find-tag) doesn't work by
> default in emacs-lisp files? There seems to be little point in
> using etags seeing that emacs already knows where the source is
> of a given function.
Because currently M-. doesn't mean "jump to definition" but "jump
to definition according to TAGS file".
That kinda depends on the mode, no?
I think it would be good to provide a generic M-. (and M-*, ..)
binding that several backends (etags, symbol-file, ...) can then
use.
That would be very nice indeed.
- emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2014/06/20
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/20
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/20
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/20
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Josh, 2014/06/20
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/20
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Ivan Kanis, 2014/06/20
- Re: emacs-lisp-mode and find-tag, Josh, 2014/06/20