Re: YouCompleteMe available as a Server

[Dmitry]

Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:

> Emacs has existing out-of-tree completion backends that talk to the same
> modules ycm uses internally (e.g., clang and jedi), so I'm not sure ycm
> is much of a win for us.

I believe the main value proposition (aside from the "shared
infrastructure" the project advertises), would be its fuzzy matching
algorithm. Emacs has nothing comparable built-in, and flx
(https://github.com/lewang/flx) hasn't yet been integrated with any
completion engines.