Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential

[Harald Hanche-Olsen]

[Bozhidar Batsov <address@hidden> (2014-08-11 17:49:29 UTC)]

> Binding multiple locals in such a form reduces the clarity of the
> code because the  semantics are not that clear anymore - should all
> the forms produce non-nil or should only the first form produce
> non-nil?

This is a valid point, I think. The macros need better nams.
I suggest if-every-let and when-every-let to make it clearer.

There, that's enough bikeshedding for one day.
I'll go back to lurking now.

– Harald