|From:||Paul Michael Reilly|
|Subject:||Re: Git transition workflow|
|Date:||Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:09:05 -0400|
Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden>:
> Paul Michael Reilly writes:Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki.
> > Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal
> > with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc?
> Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's
> CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as the git
> fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like
> workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained
> in straightforward terms.
That's one of the first things I did.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|