[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:00:35 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:47:15 +0400
> From: Dmitry Antipov <address@hidden>
> Cc: Emacs development discussions <address@hidden>
>
> What about alignment guaranteed by alloca? IIUC compilers tends
> to align it enough to US_LSB_TAG:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/x9sx5da1.aspx
This is not relevant, it talks about the Microsoft compiler.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55945
This is only about x64, AFAICT.
- [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/02
- Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings, Andreas Schwab, 2014/09/02
- Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/02
- Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/02
- Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/02
- Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/03
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/03
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Paul Eggert, 2014/09/03
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/03
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Paul Eggert, 2014/09/03
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/03
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Paul Eggert, 2014/09/03