[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:00:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Please, could you move this discussion elsewhere. While I understand
> the Guile developers might want to try and reuse either Emacs's code
> or at least its design and expertise, this discussion is about Guile,
> not about Emacs,
I think this is false. This discussion, initiated by Richard, is about
how Guile can adapt itself to better meet the needs of Emacs. If the
discussion happens where very few Emacs users/developers are present,
then I don't see how it can be useful.
Mark
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/07