[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:03:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>> You cannot successfully cater for clueless application programmers.
>>
>> It is not "clueless" to expect a UTF-8 encoder to produce valid UTF-8.
>
> We are not talking about "producing" but "reproducing" here.
I stand by my statement above, regardless of what input is feed into the
UTF-8 encoder, and I think I've said enough to make my point. You are
immovable, as always, and I don't want to waste any more time on this.
You can add this to your long list of reasons why you consider me a bad
maintainer for Guile.
Mark
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Florian Weimer, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/08