[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:39:57 +0900 |
Paul Eggert writes:
> The current behavior is useful and easy to explain and understand,
> and people use it a lot,
Granted.
> and in that sense it is not a "bug".
I give up. I can't imagine successfully communicating with someone
who defines "not a bug" that way.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12