[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:36:36 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> don't quite see how advice-add with :override would be all that
>> different from the defalias.
>
> It would be different in the fact that defalias records this location as
> "the one and only definition of this function", and a defalias can't
> be reverted.
>
> But we shouldn't use :override here either, we should
> use :around instead.
Okay, preliminary patch on the bug report.
- eieio, pretty printing, and edebug, Eric Abrahamsen, 2014/10/27
- Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/28
- Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug, Eric Ludlam, 2014/10/28
- Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug, Eric Abrahamsen, 2014/10/29
- Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/29
- Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug,
Eric Abrahamsen <=
- Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/29
- Re: eieio, pretty printing, and edebug, Eric Abrahamsen, 2014/10/29