[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git transition issues
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: git transition issues |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:17:44 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:58:33 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> No, I think you're absolutely right. Maybe not all the changes need to
> be backported, but many of them should. I recommend to backport
> most/all of them as a single commit.
I ended up backporting all of them, but in 3 different commits. A few
unrelated commits were done in-between Eric's, and since bzr doesn't
by default allow merging when there are uncommitted changes (and I
didn't want to use --force to override that), I couldn't easily commit
all the cherry-picked revisions in one go. But I think 3 is not that
bad. (The 3rd one is Glenn's revert of one part of Eric's commits.)
- git transition issues, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/10/26
- Re: git transition issues, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/26
- Re: git transition issues, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/10/26
- Re: git transition issues, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/27
- Re: git transition issues, Glenn Morris, 2014/10/28
- Re: git transition issues, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/10/28
- Re: git transition issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/28
- Re: git transition issues, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/10/28
- Re: git transition issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/28
- Re: git transition issues, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/28
- Re: git transition issues,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: git transition issues, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/10/31
- Re: git transition issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/31
- Re: git transition issues, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/10/31
- Re: git transition issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/31
- Re: git transition issues, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/10/31
- Re: git transition issues, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/31
Re: git transition issues, David Caldwell, 2014/10/26