[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: sequence manipulation functions

From: Artur Malabarba
Subject: RE: sequence manipulation functions
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:21:26 +0000

> > I think these should use a "seq-" prefix.  This will not only avoid
> > naming conflicts, but also helps discover those functions, since you
> > can type `(seq- TAB' to see all related functions.
> No.  Emacs should follow Common Lisp in this regard.
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/clm/node141.html#SECTION001800000000000000000

Could we at least add the `seq-' variants as aliases? It would greatly improve discoverability.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]