RE: sequence manipulation functions

[Artur Malabarba]

> > I think these should use a "seq-" prefix.  This will not only avoid
> > naming conflicts, but also helps discover those functions, since you
> > can type `(seq- TAB' to see all related functions.
>
> No.  Emacs should follow Common Lisp in this regard.
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/clm/node141.html#SECTION001800000000000000000
>

Could we at least add the `seq-' variants as aliases? It would greatly improve discoverability.