[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Generalizing find-definition

From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: Re: Generalizing find-definition
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:22:19 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux)

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> The only benefit would be that M-, is now "go back after M-.", which is
>> what a lot of the packages that redefine M-. do to the key.  Hence the
>> suggestion to swap the two keys, to unify that apparently rather
>> widespread use of M-,.  If Emacs would prefer to keep M-, as is, that is
>> fine with me, too.
> I see, so it's compatibility with other packages vs. compatibility with
> etags.el.  Luckily, I think there is no hurry to make this choice.
> So we could poll the users.

I believe ergonomics and frequency of use have also been mentioned. And
if find-tag will provide the "multiple occurences" interface on its own,
there won't be a need for the "next tag" command.

So, +1 from me. You might also take into account that elisp-slime-nav is
a relatively popular package: http://melpa.org/#/elisp-slime-nav

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]