Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions

[Stefan Monnier]

>> A lot of Elisp's "standard library" shares this fundamental problem.
>> The "prefix convention" is not useful only as a way to avoid name
>> collisions (which would imply that it can be "ignored" for "core
>> functions") but is also a way to structure the library, and so far the
>> core functions have not being doing a very good job of it.
> So, should I keep working on it?  I was planning to start working on the
> documentation.  Would the Sequences section of the Elisp manual be the
> right place?

Sounds good, yes.


        Stefan