Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64

[Óscar Fuentes]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> > emacs-24, please.
>> 
>> The patch does not apply on emacs-24 (4 hunks fail). This can be
>> adapted, of course, but then there will be conflicts when merging
>> emacs-24 into master. I don't like the idea of forcing someone to fix
>> conflicts on areas he most probably don't know.
>> 
>> Since this is a correctness change that solves an hypothetical future
>> problem, I'm inclined to check it into master and leave emacs-24 as is.
>> 
>> Opinions?
>
> How about applying to both (with a suitable "don't merge to trunk"
> note on emacs-24)?

Not sure how to do that on an effective way.

Pushed the change to emacs-24. Let's see how it fares after the next
merge.