[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us
|
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:26:45 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Steinar Bang <address@hidden> writes:
> My guess is that the git clone command would be better, ie. a 4-6 old
> contributed script vs. something that is standard functionality of
> git-clone.
This is git we're talking about. C'mon.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, (continued)
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Achim Gratz, 2014/11/15
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/15
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Karl Fogel, 2014/11/15
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Bill Wohler, 2014/11/16
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Steinar Bang, 2014/11/22
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/22
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Steinar Bang, 2014/11/22
- Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/15
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Kelvin White, 2014/11/15
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Bill Wohler, 2014/11/16
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Steinar Bang, 2014/11/22
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Bill Wohler, 2014/11/23
Re: A simple git workflow for the rest of us, Sergey Organov, 2014/11/24