Re: My plans for VC mode

[Eric S. Raymond]

Ivan Shmakov <address@hidden>:
>       At the very least, I hope that the calling conventions for the
>       most basic interface functions my backend provides (including
>       registered, state, working-revision, find-revision, checkin,
>       print-log) are changed in a kind of a compatible way.  (For
>       instance, I could easily make ‘state’ also accept a list of
>       files instead of just a single one.  Or so I hope, anyway.)
> 
>       Otherwise, I’d rather appreciate if the updated interface could
>       use some entirely new function names where the semantics changes
>       drastically, so that I can provide functions implementing both
>       the old and the new interface.  (I do not think it’s necessary
>       for the new VC to support the old interface in this case.)

These are completely reasonable requests, and I will attempt to
fulfill them.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>