[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:15:40 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Next, given that you have detected the spoofed URL, what do you want
> to do with it? Do you want to highlight it, do you want to de-spoof
> (i.e. undo the spoofing) in some way, but still leave some indication
> of the fact that it was spoofed, or maybe you want to remove any trace
> of the spoofing as if it never happened (and leave the user oblivious
> to the fact it did)?
I think that all commands to fetch a URL should ask for confirmation
about a URL whose display may have been confusing due to bidi.
The message should appear in a window, so it doesn't have to be terse.
It should present everything that is interesting, including the URL as
it appears in the actual context, and the URL as would appear in a
normal LTR context, and the real URL that will be fetched.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, (continued)
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/05
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/05
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/06
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/02
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/02
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/03
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs,
Richard Stallman <=