[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New assoc-let package
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: New assoc-let package |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Dec 2014 19:24:33 +0000 |
On 6 Dec 2014 11:36, "Christopher Schmidt" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> The inability to meaningfully nest different assoc-let forms makes the
> macro inflexible.
What would you consider meaningful nesting? Being able to access the variables of the outer macro inside the inner macro?
> It is probably a good idea to make the dotvars
> generalized variables.
>
I'd really like that, but I'll have to look into it.
- Re: New assoc-let package, (continued)
- Re: New assoc-let package, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/04
- Re: New assoc-let package, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/04
- Re: New assoc-let package, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/04
- Re: New assoc-let package, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/05
- Re: New assoc-let package, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/05
- Re: New assoc-let package, Christopher Schmidt, 2014/12/06
- Re: New assoc-let package,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: New assoc-let package, Christopher Schmidt, 2014/12/06
- Re: New assoc-let package, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/07
- Re: New assoc-let package, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/05
- Re: New assoc-let package, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
- Re: New assoc-let package, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/08
- Re: New assoc-let package, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/08
- Re: New assoc-let package, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/08
- Re: New assoc-let package, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/08
- Re: New assoc-let package, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/08
- Re: New assoc-let package, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/08