[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch queue management systems
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Patch queue management systems |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:39:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:36:45 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
EZ> If we don't, we will have to come up with strict criteria for granting
EZ> commit access, because commit access is global and nowadays given to
EZ> people who only work on a small number of specific areas.
It could be more fine-grained, only protecting certain branches (master,
emacs-*, etc.). Then people can push to "username/feature" branches and
maintainers can merge into a protected branch.
Ted
- Re: Patch queue management systems, (continued)
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/09
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/09
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/09
- Re: Patch queue management systems,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11