[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defending GCC considered futile
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Defending GCC considered futile |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:04:50 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Sadly, I think that the negative impact on both Emacs and GCC by
> blocking both Emacs/anycompiler and anyIDE/GCC integration is larger
> than what we can hope to achieve regarding negative impact on LLVM.
GCC is a different issue -- as far as I know, this question does not
involve GCC in any way. It may relate to GDB.
If we substitute GDB for GCC in what you wrote, your statement makes
sense. And it might be correct. But I want to see what's going on here
rather than assume.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.