[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: map.el and naming
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: map.el and naming |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:24:08 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> If there are APIs that make sense for maps, IMO they should be generic
> APIs that can handle both objects now handled by seq.el and those in
> map.el. IOW, if only some of the APIs must be map-specific, that
> doesn't mean we need to make them all map-specific, IMO.
This just doesn't make sense in Emacs Lisp because (with the exception
of hash-tables) mapping types are represented as lists, and the only
way to determine whether a list is a sequence or a map is by looking
at the function you call on it.
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Nicolas Petton, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Nicolas Petton, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Artur Malabarba, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Artur Malabarba, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/02
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/03
- Re: map.el and naming, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/03
Re: map.el and naming, bburns.km, 2015/03/03