|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: save-excursion and the mark |
Date: | Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:34:49 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> How does a change in the internal representation of > unboundness affect code that uses fboundp? After (fset 'foo nil) the old code would do (fboundp 'foo) => t whereas the new code does (fboundp 'foo) => nil -- Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |