[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:33:08 +0200 |
> From: Yuri Khan <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:15:46 +0600
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > The reason I implemented 'intangible' was for the sake of editing
> > forms. A form has fields to be edited, and fixed text that shouldn't
> > be changed. But there is no need to put point within the fixed text;
> > allowing that seems ugly.
>
> There are in fact plenty of reasons to be able to move point all over
> the form.
You can accomplish that by let-binding inhibit-point-motion-hooks.
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, (continued)
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, martin rudalics, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, martin rudalics, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/21
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/20
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, martin rudalics, 2015/03/20
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/17
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Yuri Khan, 2015/03/17
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/18