[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function

From: Helmut Eller
Subject: Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:19:24 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

On Thu, Apr 30 2015, Dmitry Gutov wrote:

> Yup, a ring might be a replacement for both next-error-last-buffer and
> next-error-buffer-p. But when will buffers be popped from it?

Maybe never, or more precisely: dead buffers in the ring are ignored and
removed automatically.

I don't know what the issue with flymake is but it would certainly be
nice if this would work without having to update existing clients.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]