[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function |
Date: |
Tue, 05 May 2015 05:47:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 5 May 2015 05:28:36 +0300 Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> wrote:
DG> On 05/05/2015 01:21 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> If we agree to implement a `next-error-priority', then perhaps
>> `next-error-find-buffer' should penalize buried buffers by subtracting
>> from their priority. Thus buffers most recently buried will have the
>> lowest priority.
DG> Well yes, if we add a new variable buffers like *compile* set, we
DG> could detect them easily. And if we not only penalized but also
DG> removed buffers with priority 0, the list should be short enough.
Right.
DG> But would we really have any priority values aside from 0 and 100? I
DG> think it makes sense for a buffer to only contain errors for itself,
DG> or only for other buffers.
So far, we only know of those two cases, yes. But we can adjust the
priority further by the buffer's stack position as I suggested above, or
by user-supplied criteria. We could make it a floating-point value but
I'm not sure that would be a usability gain :)
Ted
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/02
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/05/03
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/03
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/05/03
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/03
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Ted Zlatanov, 2015/05/04
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/04
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/05/05
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Ted Zlatanov, 2015/05/05