|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 255a011: Add `save-mark-and-excursion', which has the old `save-excursion' behavior |
Date: | Tue, 05 May 2015 13:50:11 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> + (setf nmark (marker-position saved-mark)) >> ^^^^ >> Old habits die hard. > Should `setf' be avoided? Is it only when `setq' would do instead? Sorry, I guess `setf' work as well, here. I've just been bitten by bootstrapping problems too many times, but simple.el should be late enough that it can't be a problem. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |