Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥

emacs-devel

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Yuri Khan <address@hidden> wrote:

Consider also that there is the ≫ character (U+226B MUCH GREATER
THAN), which is semantically a better match for >>.

You made a very valid point. +1

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
  - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Yuri Khan, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal <=
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Rasmus, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/11
    - RE: C-x 8 shorthands for = and =, Drew Adams, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/12
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/12
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/05/11
    - Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11