|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: etags completion table |
Date: | Sat, 30 May 2015 14:50:31 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 |
On 05/30/2015 07:00 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Agreed. But the current use of an obarray is just wrong: it makes the code use more CPU and memory resources for no benefit.
Ok, pushed that change.Are there any good uses of an obarray, aside from being employed in the Emacs Lisp runtime?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |