[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: string> missing?

From: Nick Andryshak
Subject: Re: string> missing?
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:46:44 -0400

> What would '(string> A B)' do that '(string< B A)' doesn't?

Functionally, nothing, but it seems silly to have only one without the
other, don't you think? Why would a language have '<' without '>'?

> With that argument, we'd also need string<= and string>=.

Nothing wrong with that.

- Nick

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]