[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string> missing?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: string> missing? |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:57:25 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 21:52:46 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > > Adding string> might be 200 bytes. Saving 200 bytes is insignificant.
>
> > It was also insignificant back when you decided not to include it.
>
> With all due respect, I don't think you are in a position to judge.
I'm just saying something that seemed to be a non-brainer.
If 200 bytes were significant back then, perhaps you could elaborate
on why and how it could be significant. Then we all will be on the
same page.
TIA
- Re: string> missing?, (continued)
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/06