[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package initialization
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Package initialization |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jul 2015 00:48:20 +0100 |
> Now with the package stuff the (require 'slime-autoloads) line is
> unnecessary. But additionally somebody claimed that it's idiomatic to
> call slime-setup automatically in slime-autoloads.
>
> I quite like to see the explicit call to slime-setup in my .emacs, but
> others might not.
In this case I would not autoload that (though it wouldn't be terrible to do so). It's not idiomatic for minor modes to turn themselves on as an autoload.
- Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization, Artur Malabarba, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization, Artur Malabarba, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization, Artur Malabarba, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: Package initialization, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/07/18
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Artur Malabarba, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, David Kastrup, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, David Kastrup, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, David Kastrup, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/19