[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: behaviour change in cl-subseq

From: Phillip Lord
Subject: Re: behaviour change in cl-subseq
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:34:11 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Leo Liu <address@hidden> writes:

> On 2015-08-05 20:14 +0800, Phillip Lord wrote:
>> (cl-subseq '() 10 10) ;; errors
> What did you get when you run it in Common Lisp?

Fortunately, Tassilo has answered this; I've never used CL.

I agree that this change is entirely justifiable. I'm generally not a
huge fan of silently ignoring inaccurate arguments. If you are happy
with the changed interface, then I have no major problem, although it
may break packages besides mine.

Do you mind if I patch the docstrings, though?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]