[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: seq-some-p and nil

From: Artur Malabarba
Subject: Re: seq-some-p and nil
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:19:46 +0100

2015-09-03 17:42 GMT+01:00 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
>> Two solutions come to my mind: 1) Make `seq-some-p' a pure t/nil
>> predicate, or 2) Make it behave like `some' in Common Lisp, which is
>> to return the first non-nil value which is returned by an invocation
>> of the predicate. So in CL:
> I think that functions named "<foo>-p" should return values which are
> fundamentally booleans

Agreed, and that's not the only case.
Both `seq-some-p' and `seq-contains-p' are named as predicates but do
not behave as predicates.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]