[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: seq-some-p and nil

From: Mark Oteiza
Subject: Re: seq-some-p and nil
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:37:29 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24+9 (2dac9fa02842) (2015-08-30)

On 08/09/15 at 03:21pm, Nicolas Petton wrote:
> > And defining seq-find as I did means it's always less efficient.
> It's ok, I think, for `seq-find' to reuse `seq-some'.  You can't both
> want to remove code duplication and be as efficient as the code you are
> reusing.

Why not reuse seq-find in seq-some? It at least looks (to me) a little
cleaner than the other way around

  (defun seq-some (pred seq)
    (funcall pred (seq-find (pred seq)))

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]