Re: Master is broken

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:01:29 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Also, when exactly are INLINE_HEADER_BEGIN/END required?  puresize.h
> > doesn't have it, and still compiles; other headers which use INLINE do
> > have INLINE_HEADER_BEGIN/END.  What factor determines whether they are
> > absolutely required?
> 
> They're always needed, if you want to build with --enable-gcc-warnings and 
> use 
> GCC older than 5.1.  I hope we can drop them once we assume that people who 
> want 
> picky warnings are using GCC 5.1 or later.  I forgot to add them to 
> puresize.h 
> since I use GCC 5.2; nobody else has needed them yet, I guess, since nobody 
> with 
> older compilers uses --enable-gcc-warnings.  I fixed this with the attached 
> additional patch.

Thanks.

Don't we need to make puresize.h idempotent now?