[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed new core library: pl.el

From: Artur Malabarba
Subject: Re: Proposed new core library: pl.el
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:19:30 +0000

2015-11-05 2:22 GMT+00:00 Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>:
> On 11/05/2015 04:14 AM, John Wiegley wrote:
>> There is room for improving performance, but the API is complete enough to
>> start using it. Giving the unproven status, though, perhaps it should
>> start
>> out in ELPA, and move to core after it has solidified and gained some
>> users?
> I think the rule for moving new stuff out of ELPA should be whether it's
> used by the core. That's for libraries.
> For utility packages (ui/commands/etc), the question should be asked: if it
> works fine in ELPA, why move? Popularizing ELPA would be better, IMHO.

I think pl.el would be fine on Gelpa. I've personally never felt the
need for this in core (though I've definitely missed it when writing
some external packages).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]